Compulsory Voting Unconstitutional
1. Introduction
This submission raises a constitutional and civil rights concern regarding Australia's compulsory full preferential voting system. It argues that the current method of requiring voters to numerically rank all candidates, regardless of their perceived competence or acceptability, infringes upon the fundamental democratic right to vote in a manner that reflects individual conscience and informed trust.
2. Summary of Argument
The compulsory preferential voting system requires that a voter allocate a preference to every candidate on the ballot paper, even those the voter may believe to be unqualified, corrupt, or fundamentally incompatible with their values. This system effectively coerces voters into expressing support for candidates they would otherwise reject entirely, thus violating:
- The implied right to freedom of political communication,
- The constitutional principle of a free and fair democratic process,
- The civil liberty to vote in accordance with one's conscience.
3. Relevant Legal Framework
- Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth): mandates full preferential voting in the House of Representatives.
- Australian Constitution, Section 7 and Section 24: require that Senators and Members of the House of Representatives be "directly chosen by the people."
- High Court of Australia Precedent: Recognizes implied rights essential to the operation of the Constitution, including freedom of political communication (Lange v ABC (1997)).
4. Violation of Voter Autonomy
Voting is a personal and moral expression of political will. Forcing a voter to assign preferences to all candidates under threat of invalidation of their ballot:
- Contradicts the principle of free choice,
- Compels association with candidates the voter may abhor,
- Diminishes the legitimacy of the electoral outcome.
The act of assigning a number to an untrusted or unsuitable candidate implies a degree of endorsement and compromises the voter's integrity.
5. International Human Rights Implications
Australia is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 25 guarantees every citizen the right:
"to vote... at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors."
The current system, by requiring full preferential voting, fails to ensure free expression if it compels voters to rank unacceptable candidates.
6. Suggested Alternative: Optional Preferential Voting
Optional preferential voting allows electors to express preferences only for candidates they support or consider acceptable. This method:
- Honors the voter's conscience,
- Maintains the secrecy and integrity of the ballot,
- Reduces informal vote rates due to accidental errors,
- Aligns more closely with democratic values and international obligations.
7. Conclusion
The current forced full preferential voting system is inconsistent with the Australian Constitution's implied freedoms and the right to a free and fair election. I respectfully submit that legislative reform is urgently needed to permit optional preferential voting in federal elections, thereby ensuring that every Australian can vote freely and only for candidates they deem worthy of representing them.
Comments
Post a Comment